Comments on: http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/2006-03/21/ Open Rights Group Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:33:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Andrew Sidwell http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/2006-03/21/comment-page-1/#comment-33 Andrew Sidwell Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:04:19 +0000 http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/?p=21#comment-33 (a) DRM should be left unregulated (to regulate it would be to give it more permanency than it deserves), but there should be a specific anti-circumvention law allowing circumvention for personal and private use. To do otherwise would be extending the copyright term infinitely for DRM-protected works. (a) DRM should be left unregulated (to regulate it would be to give it more permanency than it deserves), but there should be a specific anti-circumvention law allowing circumvention for personal and private use. To do otherwise would be extending the copyright term infinitely for DRM-protected works.

]]>
By: Kevin Marks http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/2006-03/21/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Kevin Marks Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:44:19 +0000 http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/?p=21#comment-2 Note that ORG has collected its own and others' <a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/orgwiki/index.php/APIG_DRM_Public_Inquiry">APIG submissions on its wiki</a>. Note that ORG has collected its own and others’ APIG submissions on its wiki.

]]>