Comments on: http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/2006-03/10/ Open Rights Group Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:33:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: James http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/2006-03/10/comment-page-1/#comment-48 James Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:00:40 +0000 http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/?p=10#comment-48 Sounds like gobbledegook to me - so much for my Oxford degree! Sounds like gobbledegook to me – so much for my Oxford degree!

]]>
By: Richard Kirk http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/2006-03/10/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Richard Kirk Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:59:41 +0000 http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/?p=10#comment-22 Compare and contrast copyright law with the Freedom of Information Act... Sensitive documents used to be stored for release after 30 years, 60 years, or very occasionally 100 years, when the original need to conceal the document will have gone. Now, if the document is known or guessed to exist, it may be asked for. The secure solution is to make sure the document does not exist. This means our country's history is being shredded. There are cases where plagarism can deprive the rightful owner of revenue or other value. With the passage of time, it becomes less and less likely that any serious case can be bought (with the strange exception of the Peter Pan copyright, which really ought not to exist). However, the threat that any old document may have copyright reserved on the original copy, and legal actions such as the case against the annagram Underground map, or the use of the Red Cross trademark in video games is stopping the copying or circulation of anything that might have a copyright or trademark. On the net in particular, that is tantamount to destroying the document itself. There should be clear limits to copyright law. Anything that is older than a certain date ought to be exempt unless there is clear evidence otherwise. There ought to be a requirement to show the plagarist has knowlingly copied, and in doing so has bought significant harm to the original author. Compare and contrast copyright law with the Freedom of Information Act…

Sensitive documents used to be stored for release after 30 years, 60 years, or very occasionally 100 years, when the original need to conceal the document will have gone. Now, if the document is known or guessed to exist, it may be asked for. The secure solution is to make sure the document does not exist. This means our country’s history is being shredded.

There are cases where plagarism can deprive the rightful owner of revenue or other value. With the passage of time, it becomes less and less likely that any serious case can be bought (with the strange exception of the Peter Pan copyright, which really ought not to exist). However, the threat that any old document may have copyright reserved on the original copy, and legal actions such as the case against the annagram Underground map, or the use of the Red Cross trademark in video games is stopping the copying or circulation of anything that might have a copyright or trademark. On the net in particular, that is tantamount to destroying the document itself.

There should be clear limits to copyright law. Anything that is older than a certain date ought to be exempt unless there is clear evidence otherwise. There ought to be a requirement to show the plagarist has knowlingly copied, and in doing so has bought significant harm to the original author.

]]>
By: David Mytton http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/2006-03/10/comment-page-1/#comment-6 David Mytton Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:31:54 +0000 http://gowers.openrightsgroup.org/?p=10#comment-6 This points presents a case for compulsory copyright registration so that after the copyright expires, it can automatically become public domain. However this would cost and considering how much material can be copyrighted, the costs may become too much. This is particularly the case with computer software which is ever changing and so the registry would require constant updating. This points presents a case for compulsory copyright registration so that after the copyright expires, it can automatically become public domain. However this would cost and considering how much material can be copyrighted, the costs may become too much. This is particularly the case with computer software which is ever changing and so the registry would require constant updating.

]]>